yuh hello I decided to pin an info post so let’s get into it

♥*♡∞:。.。 𝔸𝔹𝕆𝕌𝕋 𝕄𝔼 。.。:∞♡*♥

WELCOME! =D 

My name’s Arisa Cliché! You can call me Risa for short! This blog has been my humble corner of tumblr since 2010! I am a 30-something Adult, so if that makes you uncomfortable, don’t feel obligated to stay. 99% of the time this is a SFW blog tho, and any other rare discussions or fandom pics will be tagged as such. This is my personal blog and I typically fill it up with text posts about my life, reblogs, fandom content, human rights/political posts, aesthetic pics, and anything else I’m into! I consider myself a cripplepunk anarchist and those vibes will be present to the best of my ability in the social justice flavored takes I reblog or post. If you don’t like any of these things, I wouldn’t hit the follow button. Also, feel free to block me!

I’m a writer! I typically write original YA/NA Fantasy, Poetry, and Creative Nonfiction, but I also dabble in Fanfiction and fan theories when the mood hits me. If you’d like to support my work, I post everything on AO3 and on my sideblog, Writing with Chaos. I’ve been writing a YA book called Cynical Chaos since I was 15, and if you wanna know more about it, or meet my precious OCs, click here!

Admittedly, I don’t post as much on tumblr as I used to. I’ve mostly migrated to twitter since the 2020 Purge, but I stick around here for a safe haven when things get a little too fast paced over there (and let’s be honest the memes are way better here ;p) and also to visit the communities I’m part of! I got a lot of side blogs and there’s many things I’d miss if I completely left. I’m afraid I’m here till this place burns. If you wanna follow me anywhere else, I’m @chaosonwheels23 on both Twitter and Instagram.

My ask box is always open and I love hearing from y’all so feel free to say hi! ^_^ The only rules I really have is if you try to start arguments with me about any of the ridiculous tumblr shit/harmful irl ideologies present on this site, such as terf/swerf beliefs, anti-blm or other racism, any radical feminist stances, exclusionism/gatekeeping of any kind, puritan behavior, ableism, or shipping discourse, I will simply block you without a response. I have absolutely zero interest in debating these things. I don’t vet much except to check if you’re a bot–so if I block you and you don’t fit any of the following, it’s cause your blog was empty or you had a sus name–but if I find out you are a terf, swerf, fash trash, rad fem, or you post l*licon, I will block on sight. I do not follow back unless we’ve had friendly interactions a decent amount of times. These rules apply to all social medias.

If you’re still here after all that, click the read more for a little more about me and tag suggestions! Feel free to also read the full tag list on the right!

I hope you have a good, safe day and thanks for stopping by! (^-^✿)

Keep reading

Jul 22 '2122:5545Reblog

briefmusicbouquet:

image

also had to brainstorm a dabi spidersona and include the flowy jacket he’s got going on

i’m imagining that his webs are less elasticky and also thicker than other spider-people’s, which makes them not great for web slinging and doing super acrobatic stuff

…but they are sturdy enough that he could light one end on fire and the fire will catch and spread down the line instead of immediately disintigrating like most spider webs do

Aug 21 '2320:099ViaReblog

geiser:

i know pansexuality is not just going to dissapear just because its inherently transphobic and biphobic, but when celebrities can say shit like “I always hated the word “bisexual, because that’s even putting me in a box.” in regards of being pansexual. and still no one can see how pansexuality directly harms bi people. 

how many times tv shows and movies about lgbt issues have shied from saying bisexual by saying “no labels”, and how they’ve found a new way to avoid saying bisexual. how this feeling of “bisexuality is too restricting” has become so mainstream, how so many people are convinced pansexuality is freer, more fluid than bisexuality. how dating a trans person automatically makes u “not fit” into bisexuality.

its just so sad

Aug 21 '2319:355875ViaReblog

chongoblog:

image

im normal

Aug 21 '2319:3510316ViaReblog

casterice:

a-candle-for-sherlock:

a-candle-for-sherlock:

Gorgeous thread this morning on Twitter by @jeffreymarsh!

A few more:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image

We’ve always been here

Aug 21 '2319:3568729ViaReblog

macleod:

oneheadtoanother:

“Where do I stand on the – on the WHAT? The “Transgender Question”? Well for one thing, sir, I recall the last few usages of that particular phraseology. A group of millions is not a question – I have not yet finished speaking – not a question, but a demographic.“

“The Romans had their castrated priestesses, the Hindus their Hijras, but my god, let us take to the barricades because Uncle Al came to Thanksgiving in a skirt and pantyhose! It’s the province of rubes. Hayseed reactionaries and the worst effluvia of America’s suburban colon.”

“And Chapelle! My god, Chapelle. Embarrassing as only a true great can become in his declining years – I speak here with complete self-awareness; kindly hold your barbs – as he tires of innovation and falls back into the soporific cushion of the lowest common denominator!”

“One joke stretched until you can hear its joints popping like some poor bastard broken on the rack. “Oh my car has pronouns, I identify as a bird, I’m trans-Chinese.” The laziness of it – shameful. You should see the transgendered roast themselves; there’s true scorched earth.“

Brilliant.

Aug 21 '2319:3431152ViaReblog

homunculus-argument:

I’ve been confused for my own mother before (buying something with a credit card with my deadname on it, having a doctor’s office receptionist double-check that I am the patient and not calling on his behalf because I “sounded more mature” on the phone and parents can’t make appointments for adults), but I think the funniest wrong conclusion I’ve had strangers make about trans things I’ve had around was this time I was putting my old shit up at a flea market. I was selling stuff at a “this shit’s gotta go before I’m about to move and I’m not hauling these back to another city”-price, and this old man who apparently frequented there to find stuff that’s actually valuable being sold at such prices came to have a look at the goods while I was setting them up.

He was interested in some of my dishware, and asked politely if he could have a look at them while I was unpacking, and chatting with me while he waited for me to be done since he couldn’t buy them before I was done (I let him have dibs, but the cash register wouldn’t ring them up before I was all set). He apparently noticed that some of my silverware that I’d gotten as graduation gifts and literally never used had my old name engraved on them, but he didn’t say anything about that.

But when I put up my old graduation dress - which wasn’t worth much, cheap fake silk but it was a nice cut - he remarked “she must’ve left in a hurry to leave that behind.” Since the finnish language doesn’t have gendered pronouns, I didn’t immediately make the connection that he was referring to someone female before he gestured at the dress. Once it clicked, I figured the best course of action was to just nod that yeah, she’s not coming back for those and I’m not keeping them.

Dude had concluded that my deadname must be an ex that dumped my ass so fucking fast she didn’t even pack her silverware or nice clothes.

Aug 21 '2319:333705ViaReblog

leonstamatis:

one of the more interesting parts of the barbie movie i think is the presence of weird barbie, actually. like yes, the kens serve to show how women being in power isn’t actually that much better than men being in power, because consolidating all that power in one group means the other becomes disenfranchised and lower status or class by default. but there are also interesting things to be said about femininity and the way this movie addresses it!

like, look at every single barbie and you’ll find a lot of extremely feminine women. yes, they win nobel prizes for literature and they’re scientists and they have a whole range of skills. but they’re all also conventionally attractive and feminine, for the most part – excluding that one line about “you’re a physicist, do you want some pants?” (very odd, bc it’s not as if scientifically inclined women cannot also be effeminate, but that’s a whole other point i’m not going to get into right now.)

the only one who is not stunning, who is not put together, is weird barbie. and despite her status as part of the socially established higher class via being a barbie instead of a ken, she is still ostracized, because her version of being a barbie is not what is expected of the group. she does not comply with the guidelines and rules and structure of femininity. sure, she has a dream house, but it’s away from everyone else. sure, she’s a barbie, but everyone calls her weird and stays away from her, and she’s a sort of old wives’ tale about what could go wrong.

while she may receive some benefits of being a barbie, i.e. a woman, in this hierarchical structure, she does not receive all or even most of them – because she performs it incorrectly. (aside: i wish they hadn’t cleaned her up and made her into an attempt at hot alt pink fashion toward the end. when she’s more put together, she loses a lot of what makes her special, i think.)

allan fills a similar niche, in that he is neither allowed a place within the power structure when the barbies are in control nor when the kens are. he is a man, as far as we know, but he is not a ken. and because he is not performing his identity in the ken-approved way, he does not reap the benefits when they take over. he continues to exist as lesser, and aligns himself with the barbies.

i suppose the point i’m trying to make is that both weird barbie and allan serve an important role in this movie in pointing out the ways that those who exist outside of perceived binaries or structures are still yet harmed or disenfranchised by the enforcement of them. if that makes any sense at all.

Aug 21 '2319:303120ViaReblog

francesderwent:

Do you pay for Spotify Premium?

yes, it’s the only way to make spotify useable

no, I will never submit to their terror campaign of ads

I use someone else’s Spotify Premium account

no, but I pay for another music streaming service

something else

feeling greatly outnumbered in my principled (read: spiteful) stand against paid subscriptions

Aug 21 '2319:2813607ViaReblog

headspace-hotel:

bogleech:

duplexide:

I think the reason conservatives hate environmentalism so much is that all the terminology is too friendly and lame sounding to take seriously. I purpose we change the following terms to get these people on our side.


Solar powered -> Plasma charged

Wind power -> Vortex energy

Electric vehicle -> Lightning machine

Renewable resource -> Infinity asset

Greenhouse gasses -> Death Clouds

Global warming -> Property devaluation

Environmentalists -> Wilderness cops


For example, saying you’re a wilderness cop that drives a lightning machine powered by infinity assets to reduce death clouds and increase your property value sounds 100x more macho than the alternative.

Genuinely though, conservatives will overwhelmingly support something with a different name. I’ve seen it hundreds of times. They’re like babies this way.

“Infinity asset” kinda kicks ass

Aug 21 '2319:272370ViaReblog

obtuse-goose:

moon-o-magic:

Did you guys know the “Sickos” artist made a Sicko thats a WGA screenwriter on strike (said comic artist is a The Onion satirist comic artist and his name is Stan Kelly)

Screenshot from a The Onion satire comic. Man wearing “Sicko Screen-writers” shirt looking through innocent American family window and saying “Yes… ha ha ha… YES!” He and other writers in background all hold signs that say “On Strike.” All writers have a cartoonish expression of joyful malice.ALT

And honestly? What a mood. Haha YES indeed.

Major disservice to the community by not posting the full comic

image
Aug 21 '2319:0438005ViaReblog